• Huron Companies
    • Innosight
    • Studer Education
  • Submit RFP
  • Careers
  • Technology Partners
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Favorites
Huron Logo Huron Logo
  • Expertise
    • Business Operations
    • Care Transformation
    • Consumer Transformation
    • Digital
    • Organizational Transformation
    • Research Enterprise
    • Strategy & Innovation
    • Upcoming Huron Events

      View Events
  • Industry
    • Education
    • Energy & Utilities
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials & Manufacturing
    • Life Sciences
    • Public Sector
    • See All
    • We collaborate with the best and brightest in technology.

      Learn More About Our Partners
  • Our Experts
    • View All Expert Bios
    • Find an expert specialized in your industry.

      Book a Speaker
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • Case Studies
    • Research
    • Get the latest insights and updates from our experts.

      View All Insights
  • Investor Relations
    • News
    • Events
    • Financial
    • Stock Info
    • Corporate Governance
    • See All
    • Learn more about Huron and our most recent financial results.

      Investor Presentation
  • Contact Us
  • Expertise
    Expertise
    Business OperationsCare TransformationConsumer TransformationDigitalOrganizational TransformationResearch EnterpriseStrategy & Innovation

    Upcoming Huron Events

    View Events
  • Industry
    Industry
    EducationEnergy & UtilitiesFinancial ServicesHealthcareIndustrials & ManufacturingLife SciencesPublic SectorSee All

    We collaborate with the best and brightest in technology.

    Learn More About Our Partners
  • Our Experts
    Our Experts
    View All Expert Bios

    Find an expert specialized in your industry.

    Book a Speaker
  • Insights
    Insights
    ArticlesCase StudiesResearch

    Get the latest insights and updates from our experts.

    View All Insights
  • Investor Relations
    Investor Relations
    NewsEventsFinancialStock InfoCorporate GovernanceSee All

    Learn more about Huron and our most recent financial results.

    Investor Presentation
  • Careers
    Careers
    Join Our Talent CommunitySearch Open PositionsBenefits
  • About Huron
    About Huron
    The Huron DifferenceOur People & ValuesMaking an ImpactOur ResultsInvestor RelationsLocations
  • Help & Support
    Help & Support
    Contact UsSubmit an RFPBook a Speaker
  • Privacy
    Privacy
    Privacy StatementTerms & ConditionsCookies PolicyFraudulent OffersLabor Condition Applications
  • Contact Us
  • Favorites
    Recent Favorites
    You have no saved content.

Why Budgeting And ALM Should Be Separate

Favorite Bookmark

Kyle Duckers

Download Email Subscribe Print

Purpose-Built Applications And Why to Use Them

It’s all too common for financial institution leaders to ask, “Why do we need more than one planning and forecasting software application?” In fact, regulators have challenged some institutions for having multiple planning engines, which inevitably generate forecast variances in some future periods.

Despite this confusion, there is a strong argument to be made for having different applications for different purposes.

Understanding the Planning Cycle

Budgeting-ALMPlanning itself follows a circular, continuous cycle — making it exceedingly difficult to define a true starting point.

While the graphic to the right shows “budget” at the top (which many would assume is the starting position), reality is less straightforward. In a typical planning process, one step feeds information to the next regardless of where you start.

The differences across each planning phase are palpable:

  • Budgeting: Budgeting (which comprises target-setting, accountability and incentive compensation) is usually a “next year” exercise that relies heavily on the most recent data as an indicator. Budgeting is designed around the balance sheet and income statement for financial institutions and includes net interest margin along with noninterest income and expense. Budgeting addresses staffing plans and capital investments, along with how much product will be generated and by whom. A budget is often set annually, and actuals are compared with the budget in subsequent months. Budgets are low level and relatively short term, usually applying to the next fiscal year.
  • Forecasting: This phase involves near-term future earnings and identifying early warnings of opportunities and risks. Forecasting or reforecasting is used during the budget period when budget preparers become aware of expected changes to the numbers they set. Reforecasts are often done quarterly and sometimes monthly depending on the institution’s bandwidth.
  • Asset Liability Management (ALM) Modeling: ALM modeling (encompassing interest rate risk and liquidity monitoring) is generally an entity-level process, or may even be done using a consolidation of multiple entities. The purpose of ALM modeling is to measure interest rate and currency risk, and to monitor capital adequacy and liquidity. ALM modeling involves running different interest rate and economic scenarios to measure earnings at risk (EaR) and value at risk (VaR). ALM modeling focuses on the balance sheet and net interest margin, not most of the noninterest income and expenses.
  • Stress Scenario Modeling: This stage of planning includes integrated modeling of risk (credit, liquidity, interest rate, etc.), earnings and capital adequacy under various regulator-defined economic scenarios. This modeling goes hand in hand with ALM and puts particular stresses on the balance sheet, related net interest rate margin and related capital.
  • Long-Term/Strategic Planning: Strategic planning is key to setting aspirational growth goals, identifying long-term opportunities and risks, and outlining future investment priorities. Strategic planning may include some high-level balance sheet and earnings targets, but usually happens at the entity or consolidated entity level and reflects upper management’s goals for the company.

Each of these planning mechanisms serves a purpose, and each can feed into another. For example, strategic goals could be the basis for evaluating and adjusting the next year’s budget. The budget, which reflects achievable balance sheet targets at a low entity level, can be rolled up to feed the ALM and stress testing models. Even outputs from stress testing models should be considered when reevaluating strategic plans.

The Case for Separate Applications

Each planning phase has distinct objectives and outputs. Knowing this, it’s understandable why financial institutions rely on distinct systems to support them. The following chart demonstrates the basic, but different, approaches taken across an ALM system and a budgeting system:

Why Budgeting And ALM Should Be Separate - Chart 1

Based on these nuances in purpose and approach, it is only reasonable to use separate systems for the two processes. Yes, they should have some commonality and be aligned on certain points; this alignment happens once a year (or once a planning cycle). But in between alignment points, the short-term forecasts from each model will inevitably yield different results. The goal is to minimize those discrepancies and be able to explain why they exist.

Finding Common Ground

The most important intersection for each planning model is the starting position. All planning should begin from the position of where the institution is today. Equally important, the data for that starting point should live in a single repository that is accessible and compatible with multiple applications.

Consider these ideal points of overlap:

  • Current position data should be comprehensive. This comprises all existing financial instruments (loans, deposits, investments, borrowings and assets under management). It should include the contractual characteristics of these instruments, the current status of the instruments and any known risk information for these instruments. This data foundation should be the single source of truth for all forecasting, planning and modeling applications.
  • Dimensions should be reconcilable. It’s easy to designate a single data source if all planning systems use the same chart of accounts, but it’s not a requirement. Aligning the chart of accounts between various planning systems could mean working from a hierarchy. The budget and reforecasting processes would use the lowest level of the hierarchy for planning points, while ALM and stress testing may work off a higher tier. Strategic plans could be based on an even higher level of the chart of accounts.

Planning Product Hierarchy Excerpt:

For instance, while budgeting would occur at level 5, ALM modeling could occur at level 4, and strategic planning would never go below level 3 of the shown example. However, because each planning mechanism uses the same hierarchy, the beginning position data can be reconciled. A similar approach may be taken on other dimensions, such as organizational unit. Budgeting would be at the lowest level, ALM might be at a line of business level (i.e., a rollup of multiple organizational units), and strategic planning would be at a total legal entity perspective.

Why Budgeting And ALM Should Be Separate - Chart 2

  • Most likely rate scenarios should be consistent. Each type of forecasting involves forming an opinion about the most likely interest rate scenario for the forecast periods. Budgeting will use only a single rate forecast, which should align with the most likely rate forecast used in ALM and stress testing.
  • Prepayment assumptions should be aligned between models. If various planning models are based on the same chart of accounts, it should be simple to use the same prepayment assumptions. If ALM modeling is done at a higher chart of accounts level, minimal testing can help align the lower-level prepayment assumptions with the higher-level chart of accounts to arrive at a similar rate. These assumptions would have to be reviewed periodically to ensure accuracy.
  • New business assumptions should be in sync. These would primarily center on what new business added looks like contractually (e.g., the maturity and payment structures of new business along with new business pricing). Again, if these assumptions are determined in the budget or forecast at a lower level than they are modeled in ALM, an algorithm could aggregate the information to maintain consistency.

Each type of planning a financial institution conducts has a specific purpose. For many of these functions, there are solutions designed to help the organization perform that unique type of forecasting. Institutions should not be afraid to explain to regulators that they have multiple forecasting applications for different purposes.

Forecasts are created at different levels and serve different masters within and outside the organization. Attempting to rig ALM or budgeting tools into something they’re not is futile, not to mention a resource drain. By embracing the role each application plays in the process and making small changes to create common ground between them, financial institutions can put an end to planning confusion.


Favorite Bookmark
JS Inject Download Email Subscribe Print
Business Operations Digital Financial Services Oracle Workday

Related Work

  • Using Strategy, Automation to Drive Efficiency and Value in Regulatory Compliance

    Read More

    With proper governance and technology, financial services institutions can evolve regulatory reporting from a compliance burden to a value-add exercise.

View All

We use cookies on our website to provide you with a more personalized digital experience, enable website functionality and understand the performance of our site. You may review our Privacy Statement and our Cookies Policy. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. I Accept

  • Expertise
    • Business Operations
    • Care Transformation
    • Consumer Transformation
    • Digital
    • Organizational Transformation
    • Research Enterprise
    • Strategy & Innovation
  • Industry
    • Education
    • Energy & Utilities
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials & Manufacturing
    • Life Sciences
    • Public Sector
  • About Huron
    • The Huron Difference
    • Our People & Values
    • Making an Impact
    • Our Results
    • Investor Relations
    • Locations
  • Help & Support
    • Contact Us
    • Submit an RFP
  • Careers
    • Search Open Positions
    • Join Our Talent Community
    • Our Commitment
  • Legal
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Studer Education: Subscription Product Terms of Use
    • Cookies
    • Fraudulent Offers
    • Labor Condition Applications
Huron Logo
  • LinkedIn Icon
  • Twitter Icon
  • Facebook Icon
  • Instagram
  • Youtube Icon

© 2022 Huron Consulting Group Inc. and affiliates. Huron is a global consultancy and not a CPA firm, and does not provide attest services, audits, or other engagements in accordance with standards established by the AICPA or auditing standards promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). Huron is not a law firm; it does not offer, and is not authorized to provide, legal advice or counseling in any jurisdiction.